Nutrient Content of Bison Meat from Grass and Grain-Finished Bulls

by M.J.Marchello
Animal and Range Sciences Department,
North Dakota State University, Fargo and

J.A. Driskell
Nutritional Science and Dietetics,
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Consumers are eating bison meat as an alternative meat. Approximately 300,000 bison are being raised for meat production in North America according to Sam Albrecht, Executive Director of the National Bison Association. Bison meat does provide nutrients to meet some of the nutritional needs of humans. Some controversy exists regarding the nutritive quality of grass and grain-finished bison. The data, which exists as to the nutrient content of meat from grass and grain-finished bison, are given in this paper. More detailed descriptions of the research from which these data are derived have been published.

TABLE 1
ORIGIN OF GRASS- & GRAIN-FINISHED BISON

STATE/PROVINCE GRASS GRAIN
Alberta - 24
British Columbia - 6
California - 6
Colorado 1 3
Delaware - 1
Kansas 8 17
Manitoba - 6
Michigan - 3
Missouri - 3
Nebraska 5 -
North Dakota 2 14
South Dakota 5 -
Texas 3 -
Wisconsin 7 -
Wyoming - 4

TOTAL

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shoulder clod (triceps brachii), ribeye (Longissimus thoracis), top round (semimembranosus), and top sirloin (gluteus medius) cuts were obtained from bulls. These cuts came from 31 grass-finished (average age = 32 months) and 100 grain-finished (average age = 24 months) bulls that were raised in various regions of the United States and Canada. This should be representative of the bison meat that is available to consumers. Few differences in nutrient content were observed between the four cuts from grass-finished bulls; the same was true for the grain-finished. Therefore, the nutrient content of these four cuts was averaged.

The macronutrient and food energy content of meat from grass and grain-finished bison bulls is given in Table 2. Comments regarding the nutritional content (5:12) of this meat are also listed in Table 2. The functions of theses macronutrients and food energy are discussed in detail elsewhere.

 

TABLE 2
COMPARISON OF MICRONUTRIENT AND ENERGY CONTENT OF RAW SEPARABLE LEAN FROM GRASS- VS. GRAIN-FINISHED BISON

NUTRIENT GRASS % GRAIN % NUTRITIONAL COMMENTS
Protein (%) 21.5 21.7 Excellent source of protein.
Moisture (%) 75.9 74.6 Typical of most meats.
Fat (%) 1.7 2.2 Low in fat.  Low intakes associated with decreased incidence of heart disease & cancer.  Diet should contain <30% of calories.
Saturated fat (% of fat) 47.4 42.5 Low intakes associated with decreased incidence of heart disease & cancer.
Monounsaturated Fat (% of fat) 35.4 46.5 Higher proportion associated with decreased incidence of heart disease & cancer.
Oleic Acid (% of fat) 34.0 42.7 Higher proportion perhaps associated with decreased incidence of heart disease.
Polyunsaturated Fat (% of fat) 17.2 11.0 Higher proportion associated with decreased incidence of heart disease & cancer.
Linoleic Acid (Omega 6) 
(% of fat)
13.8 10.5 Recommended Omega-6: Omega-3 intake is 4-10.1.
Linoleic Acid 
(Omega-3) (% of fat)
3.4 0.5
Ash (%) 1.2 1.2 Reflective of total mineral content.
Cholesterol
(mg/100g)
65 66 Lean Meat.  Low intakes associated with decreased incidence of heart disease & cancer.
Food Energy
(kcal/100g)
133 141 Relatively low in calories.


The vitamin and mineral (micronutrients) content of meat from grass and grain-finished bison is given in table 3. Comments regarding the nutritional content (5-7, 9, 10, 12, 15) of this meat are also listed in Table 3. The functions of these micronutrients are discussed in detail elsewhere.

TABLE 3
COMPARISON OF THE VITAMIN AND MINERAL CONTENT OF RAW SEPARABLE LEAN FROM GRASS VS. GRAIN-FINISHED BISON

MINERAL (mg/100g) GRASS GRAIN NUTRITIONAL COMMENTS (a) Mean % of Recommended Daily Value (b)
GRASS GRAIN
Calcium
(milligram/100g)
5.5 4.9 Not a good source <1 <1
Copper
(microgram/100g)
160 142 Some samples may contain 10+%, thus a good source 8 7
Iron
(milligram/100g)
2.8 2.9 Both are good sources 16 16
Magnesium
(milligram/100g)
25.8 24.2 Some samples may contain 10%+, thus a good source 6 6
Manganese
(microgram/100g)
11.5 13.4 If use % lower estimated safe & adequate daily intake as is no daily value <1 <1
Phosphorus
(milligram/100g)
181 198 Grass-finished is good source while 18 grain finished is excellent source 18 20
Zinc
(milligram/100g)
3.3 3.8 Both are excellent sources 22 25
Sodium
(milligram/100g)
44.7 52.2 Both are low in sodium.  Recommended intake is <2400 mg daily.  High sodium intakes are associated with increased incidence of hypertension -d -
Potassium
(milligram/100g)
305 336 2000 mg. is estimated minimum requirement - -
Selenium
(microgram/100g)
105 26 If use recommended dietary allowances as is no daily value 191 47
Vitamin A
(microgram/100g)
- 0.8 Not a good source - <1
B-Carotene - nd Moderate intake levels may be associated with decreased heart disease & cancer - -
Vitamin C
(milligram/100g)
- nd Not a good source - <1
Thiamin
(milligram/100g)
- 0.043 Not a good source - 3
Riboflavin
(milligram/100g)
- 0.940 Some samples may contain 10+% thus a good source - 6
Niacin
(milligram/100g)
- 1.0110 Good source - 10
Vitamin B6
(milligram/100g)
- 0.240 Good source - 12
Vitamin B12
(microgram/100g)
- 2.565 Excellent source - 43
Vitamin E
(milligram alpha-tocopherol)
- 0.048 Not a good source 1 <1
a) References 5-7, 9, 10, 12-15.  these vitamins and minerals perform many functions in the body which are detailed elsewhere (reference 12).  Low intakes of several of these nutrients have been associated with increased incidence of heart disease, while excessive consumption of a few of these may also result in effects detrimental to human health.
b) Daily Value (given as a percentage) is an expression of recommended intake per serving that is utilized in the nutritional labelling (as Nutrition Facts) according to Food and Drug Administration regulations (reference 5).

All of these nutrient content assays were done on raw or uncooked meat. This is the usual method for presenting such data in that consumers cook their meats in different ways and to different degrees of doneness. Moisture is lost during cooking, thus increasing the concentrations of minerals and protein in the cooked meat. The vitamin content of meat is decreased following cooking with water-soluble vitamins such as thiamin, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12, being about two-thirds retained and fat soluble vitamins, such as vitamin E, about three-fourths retained. This same pattern has been observed in the cooking of meat from other species such as beef.

The information given the tables may be useful for nutritional labeling, though labeling is not required for fresh meat. Utilizing this data, producers can provide consumers with Nutrition Fact information. Based on current research, only minimal differences exist in the nutrient content of meat from bison that have been finished on grass and those finished on grain. However, more research is needed, especially controlled feeding studies. It is important that the industry speak with one voice to consumers about the nutrient content of bison meat. Consumers frequently are more interested in how bison meat compares with meat from beef, pork, or poultry, and it compares well. Research indicates that bison meat contains many nutrients, which are essential to human life and health.

Source: Smoke Signals, October 2001